Le jeu. 12 sept. 2019 à 10:28, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> a écrit : > > On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 08:06:59 +0100, Claude Warren <cla...@xenei.com> wrote: > > Actually the code I was thinking of is the multi-filter branch. It cleans > > up some names and simplifies a few things. The collections and storage > > packages might be best added as examples rather than as mainline code. > > > > In this case we just provide the bloom filter implementation, If we want > > to provide the container implementation then I think it should probably be > > modified to accept any SortedSet or NavigatableSet in the constructor. > > > > When I return home, next week, I'll take a swipe at moving the packages > > over to org.apache.commons.collections4.bloomfilter package (unless there > > is a better package name). We can then look at the entire code donation > > and decide what changes need to be made before it is accepted. > > > > Does this sound like a reasonable approach?
Any comment about my suggestion to make [Collections] modular, starting with that code ([Collections] is nearing 30k LOC...)? Gilles > [...] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
