So what do we need to move forward with this once? :-) Gruß Richard
Am Sonntag, dem 01.01.2023 um 17:09 +0100 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré: > It looks good to me. > > Thanks, > Regards > JB > > On Sat, Dec 31, 2022 at 12:15 PM Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> > wrote: > > I've experimented with another approach, a single version > > supporting both javax.transaction and jakarta.transaction: > > > > https://github.com/ebourg/commons-dbcp/tree/dual-javax-jakarta > > > > The only classes using javax.transaction are in the > > org.apache.commons.dbcp2.managed > > package. This package is copied at build time to > > org.apache.commons.dbcp2.managed.jakarta > > with the javax imports replaced. > > > > This solution is easier than maintaining two versions is parallel. > > > > What do you think? > > > > Emmanuel Bourg > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > ---- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
