I think the natural next question is whether we can have a major version change?
Mike On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 6:24 AM sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, 29 Sept 2023 at 12:13, Filip Strajnar <filip.straj...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Greetings, > > > > > > I've noticed that some methods on the org.apache.commons.mail.Email > > class provide fluent interface (examples include setCc, addBcc, > > addReplyTo), and some do not (to name a few: setAuthentication, > > setSmtpPort, setMailSession). Is this intentional, or am I allowed to > > submit a PR that would change all relevant void methods so that they > > would return an Email object instead? > > The return type is part of the Java method signature. > > Changing it would affect binary compatibility, so would not be > possible without a major version change. > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > Filip Strajnar > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
