[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Chris Anderson updated COUCHDB-194:
-----------------------------------

    Affects Version/s:     (was: 0.9)
                       0.10

r755926 adds an inclusive_end query option, defaulting to true (the previous 
behavior).

inclusive_end=false will make the endkey and open-interval. I'm open to 
switching this to the default, but I won't do that unless there is a strong 
call for it.

> [startkey, endkey[: provide a right-open range selection method
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: COUCHDB-194
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-194
>             Project: CouchDB
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: HTTP Interface
>    Affects Versions: 0.10
>            Reporter: Maximillian Dornseif
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 0.9
>
>
> While writing something about using CouchDB I came across the issue of "slice 
> indexes" (called startkey and endkey in CouchDB lingo).
> I found no exact definition of startkey and endkey anywhere in the 
> documentation. Testing reveals that access on _all_docs and on views 
> documents are retuned in the interval
> [startkey, endkey] = (startkey <= k <= endkey).
> I don't know if this was a conscious design decision. But I like to promote a 
> slightly different interpretation (and thus API change):
> [startkey, endkey[ = (startkey <= k < endkey).
> Both approaches are valid and used in the real world. Ruby uses the inclusive 
> ("right-closed" in math speak) first approach:
> >> l = [1,2,3,4]
> >> l.slice(1,2)
> => [2, 3]
> Python uses the exclusive ("right-open" in math speak) second approach:
> >>> l = [1,2,3,4]
> >>> l[1,2]
> [2]
> For array indices both work fine and which one to prefer is mostly an issue 
> of habit. In spoken language both approaches are used: "Have the Software 
> done until saturday" probably means right-open to the client and right-closed 
> to the coder.
> But if you are working with keys that are more than array indexes, then 
> right-open is much easier to handle. That is because you have to *guess* the 
> biggest value you want to get. The Wiki at 
> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/View_collation contains an example of that 
> problem:
> It is suggested that you use
> startkey="_design/"&endkey="_design/ZZZZZZZZZ"
> or
> startkey="_design/"&endkey="_design/\u9999″
> to get a list of all design documents - also the replication system in the db 
> core uses the same hack.
> This breaks if a design document is named "ZZZZZZZZZTop" or 
> "\9999Iñtërnâtiônàlizætiøn". Such names might be unlikely but we are computer 
> scientists; "unlikely" is a bad approach to software engineering.
> The think what we really want to ask CouchDB is to "get all documents with 
> keys starting with '_design/'".
> This is basically impossible to do with right-closed intervals. We could use 
> startkey="_design/"&endkey="_design0″ ('0′ is the ASCII character after '/') 
> and this will work fine ... until there is actually a document with the key 
> "_design0″ in the system. Unlikely, but ...
> To make selection by intervals reliable currently clients have to guess the 
> last key (the ZZZZ approach) or use the fist key not to include (the _design0 
> approach) and then post process the result to remove the last element 
> returned if it exactly matches the given endkey value.
> If couchdb would change to a right-open interval approach post processing 
> would go away in most cases. See 
> http://blogs.23.nu/c0re/2008/12/building-a-track-and-trace-application-with-couchdb/
>  for two real world examples.
> At least for string keys and float keys changing the meaning to [startkey, 
> endkey[ would allow selections like
> * "all strings starting with 'abc'"
> * all numbers between 10.5 and 11
> It also would hopefully break not to much existing code. Since the notion of 
> endkey seems to be already considered "fishy" (see the ZZZZZ approach) most 
> code seems to try to avoid that issue. For example 
> 'startkey="_design/"&endkey="_design/ZZZZZZZZZ"' still would work unless you 
> have a design document being named exactly "ZZZZZZZZZ".

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to