[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13651356#comment-13651356
 ] 

Robert Newson commented on COUCHDB-1368:
----------------------------------------

thanks.
                
> multipart/related document body doesn't identify which part is which 
> attachment
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: COUCHDB-1368
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1368
>             Project: CouchDB
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: HTTP Interface
>            Reporter: Jens Alfke
>            Priority: Minor
>
> If you GET a document with attachments in multipart/related format (by adding 
> ?attachments=true and setting Accept:multipart/related), the MIME bodies for 
> the attachments have no headers. This makes it difficult to tell which one is 
> which. Damien says they're in the same order that they appear in the 
> document's "_attachments" object ... which is fine if you're Erlang, because 
> Erlang preserves the order of keys in a JSON object, but no other JSON 
> implementation I know of does that (because they use hashtables instead of 
> linked lists.)
> The upshot is that any non-Erlang code trying to parse such a response will 
> have to do some by-hand parsing of the JSON data to get the _attachment keys 
> in order.
> This can be fixed by adding a "Content-ID" header to each attachment body, 
> whose value is the filename. It would be nice if other standard headers were 
> added too, like "Content-Type", "Content-Length", "Content-Encoding", as this 
> would make it work better with existing MIME multipart libraries.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to