It would be helpful for me (and perhaps others, I think) if more examples/details were given about the intended audience and use.
The emphasis on screenshots makes me suspect that "design" means "UI/CHI/visual design" rather than "software architecture," but it's still not clear exactly what would be considered on-topic for the proposed space (Fauxton? Couchapps? Anything with a CouchDB backend?). To my old-fashioned MVC brain, the model is separated from the view by the controller, which means that the choice of backing store doesn't impact the UI much. What criteria could I use to know if my project is on topic? I'm mostly interested because I'd like to know if I should lurk there too or not. :) Thanks, Eli On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Alexander Shorin <kxe...@gmail.com> wrote: > Good morning, Michelle! > > That's really good idea to choose better platform for target audience > which simplifies main use cases. Should be interesting experiment (: > > The problem could be with the policy that all the ASF project > discussions should happens on ASF mailing lists. So, with using > thirdparty service, we need to workaround this somehow. That means > don't throw too far away your idea with design@ ML. > > Cannot say anything good or bad about medium or else platform, but +1 > such turn of events. > > -- > ,,,^..^,,, > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Michelle Phung <michel...@apache.org> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I would like to open an account on a platform for CouchDB designers, design >> advocates, and design enthusiasts. >> >> It is a place to discuss all things design related with respect to CouchDB. >> It could be a good place for people to learn about design. >> >> there are some design threads on github, which let people comment, and it >> supports inline comments with screenshots, but maybe some designers are not >> on github. >> >> medium.com is another option. >> >> more ideas? >> >> Michelle Phung
