Sounds good, except one thing: As we have a separate shared-dsml module and in your previous mail you said you want to keep it, I wonder if it makes sense to keep shared-ldif in a separate module? An the other side, LDIF is used all the time when dealing with LDAP.
Kind Regards, Stefan On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi guys, > > as I have merged all the schema modules into shared-ldap-schema, I'm > continuing to merge the modules that does not deserve to be standalone. Here > are the next targets : > - shared-ldap-constants should be part of shared-ldap > - shared-ldif should be part of shared-ldap > - shared-ldap-jndi may remain a separate module atm > - shared-ldap-converter should be part of shared-ldap > - shared-cursor should be part of shared-ldap > - shared-asn1 and shared-asn1-codec are an anomaly : right now, I really > think those two modules should be merged into shared-ldap, but as > shared-asn1-codec has a dependence on MINA, it's better to keep them > independent. I would like to be able to get rid of this MINA dependency, by > defining the MINA references through providers, but this is a 1 day effort I > don't have the desire to do now. If someone have time to work on decoupling > shared from MINA completely, that would be a good move (well, MINA > dependencies could be declared with a scope <test>, but otherwise, we should > not depend on MINA at all, IMO). > > Thoughts ? > > -- > Regards, > Cordialement, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com > >
