[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13199773#comment-13199773
]
Pierre De Rop commented on FELIX-3337:
--------------------------------------
I committed a new test which seems to reproduce the issue:
src/test/java/org/apache/felix/dm/test/FELIX3337_UpdatedConfigurationDependencyWithPropagationTest.java
> DependencyManager/Updated configuration dependency does not propagate to
> provided service properties
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FELIX-3337
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3337
> Project: Felix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Dependency Manager
> Affects Versions: dependencymanager-3.0.0
> Reporter: Pierre De Rop
> Priority: Minor
>
> This issue is related to the following post:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg11711.html
> The problem is the following; it seems that when a service S1 depends on a
> ConfigurationDependency with propagate = true, then the configuration is
> propagated to the service properties provided by S1, but when the
> configuration is changed (by ConfigAdmin), then the S1 service properties are
> not updated.
> For example, here is the service S1 which depends on a Configuratin pid
> "test":
> Component s1 = m.createComponent()
> .setImplementation(new S1()))
> .setInterface(S1.class.getName(), null)
> .add(m.createConfigurationDependency()
> .setPid("test")
> .setPropagate(true));
> We assume that the configuration pid "test" contains "testkey=testvalue"
> Now, we have S2, which depends on S1 like this:
> Component s2 = m.createComponent()
> .setImplementation(new S2())
> .add(m.createServiceDependency()
> .setService(S1.class, ("(testkey=testvalue)"))
> .setRequired(true)
> .setCallbacks("add", "change", null));
> So, at initialization, S2 is properly injected with S1 (in its "add" method).
> But when the configuration is updated, S2 is not called back in its "change"
> method (I think that it should be, because the ConfigurationDependency
> declared in S1 is using propagate=true flag.
> I will manage to commit a testcase which reproduce this issue.
> /pierre
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
