I'm not convinced that this is needed. As I commented on the previous thread, the only reason that this is a problem is that a single thread is creating multiple consumers. If you use a single consumer, per thread this would not be an issue.
Regards, Hiram On 8/8/06, Pesochinskiy, Vadim (MSCIBARRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi! I am trying to figure out how this can be done. As I understand messages are forwarded by the queue to every consumer (PrefetchSubscription). As long as number of messages dispatched does not exceed the prefetchSize, messages are send to the client. As soon as messages are acked more messages are dispatched to the client. When I set prefetchSize=0 no messages are ever delivered. In this case instead of pushing messages from the server, they will have to be requested by the client every time receive() or receiveNoWait() is called. Are you OK with this impelementation? BTW, are you guys convinced that AMQ-855 is an issue that needs to be resolved? To remind you, I need multiple consumers to implement our prioriteis requirements. In some cases consumers maybe be idle for a long time and as a result they hold real-time messages, which otherwise could to be processed by other consumers. https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-855 http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=5583273&framed=y -------------------------------------------------------- NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify sender. Sender does not intend to waive confidentiality or privilege. Use of this email is prohibited when received in error.
-- Regards, Hiram Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
