Sounds good. --kevan On Aug 9, 2006, at 3:02 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Looks like the testing of OpenEJB is good. I'd like to go ahead with the tagging and bagging of OEJB 2.1.1. If there are no objections I'll update branches/v2_1_1 to be 2.1.1 and then move it to tags.Objections?
