I asked a few times about a formal vote... that all went unanswered.  Informally though the response was positive, as I noted in a previous email:

<snip>
 +1: dain, jason (me), paul, sachin, david jencks, david blevins,
prasad, anita, gianny, alan, matt
"in favor": aaron
"all for dropping, w/ tck consideration": jeff
"don't see any harm in dropping": kevan
</snip>

:-\

Shall we make a formal vote then?

--jason


On Aug 17, 2006, at 9:55 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:

What happened to a vote?


Regards,
Alan

Jason Dillon wrote:
Okay... replying to myself.

How about... since no one has had anything to say.

I suggest we drop the m1 build at the end of next week, friday the 25th.

And unless I hear any objections I am going to follow through... so
please speak up if you want to keep the old rusting clunker around for
longer.

--jason



On 8/9/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So far there have been no negative reponses, and several PMC +1s

Can we start an official vote and then plan for the removal of m1?

--jason


On Aug 9, 2006, at 1:24 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:

> +1
>
> Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>> I propose we remove the m1 build.  It has been broken for several
>> days now and no one has noticed.  Here is my vote:
>> +1 to remove the m1 build
>> -dain




Reply via email to