Ok, I've found jstl on the java.net repo at this location:

https://maven-repository.dev.java.net/repository/jstl/

Are there any issues with downloading items from java.net?

Unfortunately it's substantially larger that what we had with JSTL 1.1 and it appears that the reason is it includes a whole lot more stuff (strangely most of it under an org\apache\... path).

THe other strange thing is that this jstl jar doesn't match the content of the one included with the full Glassfish download (which is a good thing since the jar in the full image only seems to include the extra gorp and not the classes that we need from the spec).

Joe


Joe Bohn wrote:
Yes, we could look at implementing our own or building on the 1.1 Jakarta impl. I'm a little hesitant to do that given that the Jakarta folks themselves have considered this and apparently decided not to pursue that path. I figure they know more about this than I do.

However, using Glassfish may not be that simple either. So far I haven't seen the Glassfish published JSTL in any public repo. I also haven't found a way to download just the JSTL impl from Glassfish apart from downloading the entire image.

Still investigating ....

Joe

Prasad Kashyap wrote:

Here's another option. Depending on how much the spec has changed
between 1.1 and 1.2, we could fork jakarta and provide our own
implementation. Just a thought.

Then again, what are the pros and cons of picking up Glassfish ?

Cheers
Prasad

On 10/19/06, Paul McMahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Does anyone know of an alternative to Glassfish's JSTL 1.2?  Also, I
wonder if Jakarta might consider providing an implementation if we
expressed interest in using it in Geronimo?

Paul

On 10/18/06, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm looking at what it would take to include an implementation of JSTL
> 1.2 (JSR 52) for compliance with JEE 5 in Geronimo.  We currently
> include the Jakarta implementation of the 1.1 spec in some of our web
> applications (such as the web console) but not directly in the Geronimo
> J2EE server.
>
> I think the first order of business is to see if I can pick up an open
> source implementation and spec from someplace.  I asked on the Jakarta
> taglibs user mailing list and was told that there is not an effort
> underway to implement the 1.2 version of this spec.  They then pointed
> me to Glassfish.
>
> So, I'm planning to investigate what it would take to include the
> Glassfish implementation into Geronimo.  If any body has any
> concerns/objections/recommendations/insight/etc...  please speak up.
>
> Thanks,
> Joe
>





Reply via email to