I'd like to come back to this thread an handle it. The number of modules is growing and it would be cleaner to reorg all these modules.
So, unless someone objects, I will reorg the svn source tree on friday. On 7/28/06, Philip Dodds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I put together a basic plan (with some help from Guillaume), here http://goopen.org/confluence/display/SM/Source+Structure The purpose of the new structure it two allow cleaner separation between: 1/ The JBI Container 2/ Deployables such as shared libraries/BC's/SE's 3/ Platform specific packaging projects 4/ Archetypes 5/ Tooling 6/ Sampels By categorizing the source it should become easier to read and therefore identifying what SE/BC's/SL's are available should become more obvious, as well as cleanly showing what is required for core Container functionality. There are a couple of ommissions - first rather than one assembly (currently apache-servicemix project) I would like to add a root directories called assemblies and then create a few packaging (as previously mentioned) ie. assemblies \ core-only \ core-and-components etc. The other is the servicemix-components package, there are two ways to go here: 1/ Break up the components into different service engines 2/ Turn the servicemix-components jar into an SE, add a dependencies on the servicemix-lwcontainer and then change all the libs to optional false I'm not keen on the first way because I think the conversion to real SE's will take some time and should be given space to make sure we are able to address things like WSDL for services etc. In the second option we end up with a large SE though I believe it will provide all the functionality, I was thinknig that this would be a special packaging - ie. your can download just that big SE separate from the other assemblies. I would like to try and get a discussion going on this since once this is out of the way we could then look to the work invovled in converting some of the lw-container service engines into more complete JBI Service Engines (using the service-engine architype as a basis) and also work on puting more WSDL in place for those services :) P
-- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet
