+1 for 1.5, but perhaps keep the client-side 1.4 compatible?
On 11/15/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1. We should switch to Java 5 for compilation and for the default release (since the concurrent stuff is faster & more bug free on Java 5) but maybe provide a retrotranslator version of the jars for those who can't move JVM. i.e. build on Java 5 only - but allow deployments on 1.4 On 11/15/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi folks, > > How do you guys feel about switching the minimum run time requirement > for ActiveMQ 4.2 to be Java 5?? I'm itching to do this since Java 5 > has a much better set of concurrent implementation. > > We can keep the 4.1.x branch alive as the Java 1.4 compatible version. > Also I have a feeling that once we switch to Java 5, someone will > figure out how to use retrotranslator to make our Java 5 binaries also > run on Java 1.4. But I doubt anybody will make any efforts to look > into that until we actually jump to Java 5. > > So what do you say? Shall we switch ?? > > -- > Regards, > Hiram > > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com > -- James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
