This is using durable subscription with the store pending cursor. With a modest number of messages (~ 100,000 msgs x 10 kilobytes each) queued up for an offline durable subscriber, I am seeing a substantial decrease in producer enqueue performance once the durable subscriber comes online. For example, performance can fall to < 10 messages per second. I am seeing this even with the Kaha store.
(I'd much rather see the consumer performance go down than this much impact on a producer.) Any ideas? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Store-Pending-Performance-tf2715247.html#a7570754 Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
