+1. Oh yeah, I agree. Let's give it a shot with all the best that we have.
Cheers Prasad On 12/5/06, Paul McMahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Matt, JEE5 is critical to the widespread adoption of Geronimo. We can and should accomplish these milestones. Best wishes, Paul On 12/4/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While ripping out drywall this weekend I was thinking about our > Geronimo 2.0 and all the work that needs to get done to complete this > monsterous effort. While sifting through the scorecard and thinking > about all the different things that need to be addressed it became a > bit overwhelming. As everyone knows many different projects are > working on their implementations of Java EE 5.0. Some are available > and others are works in progress (as is ours). It seems that from > user perspective people are really interested in the Java EE and have > been asking for several months about where we are. At this point it > would be nice to give them an idea of what we're thinking about. > > I had previously put out a set of milestones and dates. I wanted to > make it a little more formal and of course with all the caveats that > this is open source and our timetables are subject to people's time > and contribution. > > With that, here is an updated timeline and some graphic > representations that represent the Java EE specifications that need > to be completed from a high level. > > I think it was Dain that used the term table stakes when referring to > the specification. Meaning that we need the spec related > functionality to get in the game but innovations beyond the > specification were necessary to make a bigger splash. I don't > capture those here but I'll work on pulling that together as well. > > Take a look at http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/Geronimo2.0/ and > provide your thoughts on how were doing. > > If we are going to make a Dec 22 Beta 1 then we would have to cut > sometime in the next week and a half. > > What do y'all think? > > Matt Hogstrom > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >
