On Dec 4, 2006, at 8:57 PM, John Sisson wrote:
Jason Dillon wrote:
Maybe it is starting your response with the word "What?". I could
have interpreted it completely differently to how you intended, but
it did not make you seem friendly and approachable.
Eh.. maybe :-P
Maybe "Huh?"... "Hrm...?" "Whaddyamean?" "Wha-what?"...
Though they all seem to end up suggesting that I am surprised. Funny
that the plain english version makes it seem like I am being a prick
or something :-P
As I mentioned in the initial email, the AntHill license is very
similar to that of JIRA or Confluence... they grant licenses for
use by open-source projects.
Can the full text of the open source license be sent to the PMC for
vetting?
Sure. Did the PMC do any vetting for JIRA or Confluence?
I had hopped to get a more perfect and complete system before I
brought this to the community... though I'm not sure that would
have mattered much. Probably more that the tool is not open-
source is why you even mention this. If I did something similar
with CC or Continuum no one would even mention it. Too bad
neither of those tools is comprehensive enough to do the job
though... but maybe if we wait for a few more years they will be
closer.
:-P
Maybe I need an apple mail plugin to randomly insert emotions into
mail so that folks don't think that I am being harsh...
Maybe :-) Everyone doesn't have the same thickness of skin.
Maaaaybbbeeeee not. :-) I know sometimes I misjudge the tone of
email, :-P, and then reply with similar tone to that which I
interpreted ;-) :-P
IMO best not to think about tone at all when reading email... more
often than not the interpreted tone is more a manifestation of your
own mood than what the text of the message actually indicates. :-)
:-)
:-P
--jason
