2.0 followed by 2.0-geronimo-developer :o) --vamsi
On 12/6/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Dec 5, 2006, at 2:41 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: > On Dec 5, 2006, at 11:34 AM, Sachin Patel wrote: >> I don't see the confusion at all, as long as the M<n> is preceded >> by the final release version (ex. geronimo-2.0-M1). > > Yes, but already Matt is referring to "M1" with no 2.0 prefix. > > Anyways... I don't like it... but I don't have the energy to debate > it. My bad. I meant 2.0-M1...I'll correct that omission in the future. I now understand the confusion. What other suffix do you think would be appropriate? I don't care if its 2.0-frog1. Following an evolutionary theme we could have: 2.0-proteinStrand 2.0-singleCellOrganism 2.0-fish 2.0-frog 2.0-chimp 2.0-homosapien 2.0 :) > > --jason > Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
