On Dec 31, 2006, at 10:54 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Dec 30, 2006, at 1:51 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
David is out of town but I think I can answer.... The previous
release was only a milestone. These are final 1.0 jars that have
been verified using the JEE 5 signature tests. If you want to
know what has changed just run svn diff:
Right, but I didn't ask a question. I stated that we ought to be
identifying this information in the vote (or a previous discussion
thread). All it takes is -- "Testing of the EJB3 spec has
identified signature problems in the existing 1.0-M1 release of the
spec. I've fixed these problems and updated the version numbers of
the specs that EJB3 is dependent on. I propose we release a final
1.0 version of EJB3." This way all voters (and non-voters) understand.
I agree that the person proposing the vote should provide some
information about what the changes are. It seems a little
unreasonable to rely on an svn diff to document the changes.
For the record -- I'm +1 for a release. Due to the finger check in
the original vote, I'd suggest that a new vote be called, but admit
that may be going a bit overboard...
I'm ok with the vote proceeding as is...+1
--kevan
Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
