How hard is it to switch between the different assemblies once the TCK
testing environment is setup? If it is easy enough, maybe we should
first test all 8 assemblies and then concentrate on only those that
pass the most tests.

Jarek

On 1/9/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think testing say (Tomcat+Axis2+OpenJPA) and (Jetty+CXF+Cayenne) is
enough. All components should be tested at least once. If we get time,
we could do more :)

-- dims

On 1/8/07, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 7, 2007, at 9:38 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> > On Jan 7, 2007, at 11:33 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> >
> >> I was thinking about M2 this weekend and was considering many of
> >> the challenges we face in putting out certified releases.  Up till
> >> now the number of permutations has been pretty limited and that
> >> has been Jetty and Tomcat.  With Java EE 5.0 life is no longer
> >> that simple.  Here are the choices I know of today:
> >>
> >> Web Container (Tomcat / Jetty)
> >> WebServices (Axis 2 / CXF)
> >> EJB 3.0 Persistence (OpenJPA / Cayenne)
> >>
> >> I think this makes 6 different assemblies and of course 6 separate
> >> certification efforts.  Perhaps we can do this and perhaps we
> >> can't.  Based on where projects are at and their desire to
> >> participate in helping to integrate (and do TCK testing :).
> >
> > ummm 2 * 2 * 2 == 8
> >
> > I could be very wrong but I thought that the cmp 2.1 support in
> > openejb3 was relying on openjpa-specific features.  If so I wonder
> > if it will be tricky to run the tck on other jpa implementations.
>
> Well, we depend on being able to listen to events on the EM which
> there is no spec interface for.  I'm sure Cayanne has and interface
> that can provide us with the events, and when they send us the info
> we can add a hook for their Impl.
>
> In general, I think we should just pick a single JPA implementation
> to ship with G because it is very easy for an application to request
> a different implementation using specification defined properties.
>
> Of course that will leave us with 4 javaee assemblies and 2 minimal
> assemblies.
>
> -dain
>


--
Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers)

Reply via email to