Hello Chris, Is there some specific scenerio where you are getting java heap space error.
What I am guessing is that there can be a scenerio where classloaders are cyclic. Is it possible, that Classloader C1 is a parent of Classloader C2 Classloader C2 is a parent of Classloader C3 Classloader C3 is a parent of Classloader C1 If it is a possible, I need to figure out a way to know it and make changes in tree, else it will continue filling the tree in cyclic order. Anyone please let me know if the above scenerio is allowed or not. (If it is allowed how is classes loaded, it will continue looking for class in cyclic order forever and never load it.) Thanks Rakesh On 1/11/07, Rakesh Midha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oh I didnt see the JavaHeap space error about, let me check it out. thanks Rakesh On 1/11/07, Christopher M. Cardona < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Kevan, > > FYI, I updated https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2689 to > include a patch that will fix the javascript error. You should be able > to view the new portlets at least. Please let me know if you still get > problems. > > Best wishes, > chris > > Kevan Miller wrote: > > > > On Jan 10, 2007, at 2:37 PM, Christopher M. Cardona wrote: > > > >> Hi Rakesh, > >> > >> I was able to run the new portlets using trunk rev494034 but needed > >> to change all view.jsps because I get javascript errors related to > >> your calls to dojo.require(). The console uses Dojo 0.4.1 right now > >> and I'm guessing you used a different version during development. > >> Some widget names changed in 0.4.1. > >> > >> I'm getting a different problem this time using the ClassLoader > >> viewer. I get javax.servlet.ServletException: Java heap space: > > > > I've seen this error, also. None of the views were working for me. > > Wasn't sure if it was a Safari issue or something else. Rakesh, can > > you take a look at these issues (javascript errors and memory > > consumption by ClassLoader viewer)? > > > > Paul, > > Are you suggesting that we should start architecting the console to be > > more pluggable? Or suggesting that Rakesh rewrite these viewers? > > > > --kevan > > > >
