Re: 2.0 & geronimo-qname_1.1_spec

[Matt Hogstrom]

+1 to remove it.

On Jan 11, 2007, at 1:21 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:

Do we need to include qname anymore? Looks like that is part of se 5 now...

Anyone know?

--jason

Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]