On Jan 12, 2007, at 6:55 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
On Jan 12, 2007, at 12:32 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Do you (or anyone else) know why we have a geronimo-transaction
and geronimo-transaction-jta11 module?
Why do we need 2 modules for this?
We don't anymore, but we did/do for 1.2.x as we can't certify on
J2EE 1.4 with the jta 1.1 library in the path.
Okay, I think we should merge geronimo-transaction-jta11 into
geronimo-transaction-jta for server/trunk then.
OK
The original motivation was to reuse the 1.0.1 code in the 1.1 tm
without 2 copies of the code. In the 2.0 work this is no longer
necessary.
This may mean that 2.0 won't expose a 1.0.1 compatible tm, forcing
e.g. jencks to go to 1.1. I doubt this would be a problem.
thanks
david jencks
--jason
