Ya I was just hinting that we should come up with a standard place to
put the instance data tree, which might mean a slight alteration of
the standard tree too... but I'm not really sure, just wanted to put
it out there.
--jason
On Jan 27, 2007, at 6:11 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
On Jan 27, 2007, at 5:38 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
I think in order to allow multiple instances to work off of the
same installation effectively we need to have a tiered repository
support, so that each instance could include a shared read-only
repository (the system repository), and then a read-write
repository (instance repository), where artifact resolution would
first check the instance repo, then the system repo.
If we do want to start supporting this, I suggest we also revisit
the basic server's file structure, as we will need to insert a
hierarchy for the instance data.
--jason
IWhat if we started somthing in var like:
./var/servers/server.n
The server.n sould be some arbitrary name that users would identify
the names of the server instance. We would look in the instance
tree first and if something wasn't found we'd look in the main
tree. Is that what you meant?
