Thanks Paul. That sounds really good. I was hoping that we could stay with Myfaces too but I was just getting concerned based upon the comments I kept seeing. It sounds like we're closer than I thought.

Thanks,
Joe


Paul McMahan wrote:
I hope that Geronimo can use Myfaces for JSF since they are also an
apache project.   I successfully built their 1.2 snapshot today with
very little trouble (just disabled unit tests).   Then I included
their jars in a JSF 1.2 web application and successfully deployed it
to Geronimo.   The Myfaces engine successfully parsed the
faces-config.xml and started the webapp.   I was able to access the
webapp from my browser and interact with the JSF controls.   I think
that they are close enough to providing a usable JSF 1.2 driver that
we should continue to work with them for delivery in Geronimo 2.0.

Best wishes,
Paul

On 1/31/07, Sachin Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, I think we should consider this. From what I hear its been weeks since
My Faces has been able to build.  We could always swap back as soon as My
Faces provides a driver.  I think we need this for the beta, and if we're
going to do it, better now than later.




On Jan 30, 2007, at 2:41 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:

I've seen several comments in the release notes and on the user list about MyFaces 1.2 not yet being functional in Geronimo 2.0. Does anybody know if this will be functional soon and more specifically, if it will be functional
in time for our 2.0 beta?

Should we maybe be looking for an alternative for 2.0 (possibly glassfish)?

Joe

-sachin



Reply via email to