I switched our console-testsuite to use Mojo's s-m-p and found that
our tests broke with the following error
testApacheConfigLink(org.apache.geronimo.testsuite.console.ApacheConfigPortletTest)
Time elapsed: 7.491 sec <<< FAILURE!
com.thoughtworks.selenium.SeleniumException: ERROR: Threw an
exception: selenium.removeCookie is not a function
at
com.thoughtworks.selenium.HttpCommandProcessor.doCommand(HttpCommandProcessor.java:73)
at
com.thoughtworks.selenium.HttpCommandProcessor.getString(HttpCommandProcessor.java:150)
at
com.thoughtworks.selenium.DefaultSelenium.getEval(DefaultSelenium.java:214)
at
org.apache.geronimo.testsupport.ExtendedSelenium.removeCookie(ExtendedSelenium.java:49)
at
org.apache.geronimo.testsuite.console.ConsoleTestSupport.logout(ConsoleTestSupport.java:53)
at
org.apache.geronimo.testsuite.console.ApacheConfigPortletTest.testApacheConfigLink(ApacheConfigPortletTest.java:43)
Mojo's plugin does not include the user-extension.js that we have in our plugin.
Cheers
Prasad
On 2/9/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Prasad, when you have a sec, can you see if there are any issues
using the s-m-p from the mojo project with our testsuite?
If not, lets start using that and deprecate the version in genesis...
okay?
--jason
On Feb 9, 2007, at 1:27 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>
> Jason Dillon a écrit :
>> I've not made any changes as of recent, though I will probably
>> update it soonish to support some extra bits to fire off a xvfb
>> instance so I can setup virtual X11 displays for firefox to run
>> under. I've got commit on mojo, so it should be easy enough to
>> collaborate, though Prasad does not... so any changes from him
>> will have to funnel through one of us, or we need to get him
>> commit on mojo.
>
> I don't think it will be a problem for commit access. We are open.
>
>> Anyways, we can start to deprecate the G version and move over to
>> the Mojo version.
>
> cool
>
>> Have you made any changes to it (short of the Selenium version
>> bits I noticed, and some formating)?
>
> I don't think, but we can check it.
>
>> G will need some kinda of non-snapshot in order to use, but that
>> should not be a big deal.
>
> We can release a first version, np.
>
> Emmanuel
>> --jason
>> On Feb 9, 2007, at 12:44 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>>> I'm agree, we don't need 2 plugins but on Mojo, it's more easy to
>>> find it.
>>>
>>> Jason, do you continue to work on it in geronimo? I think it
>>> would be better to work only on the one at Mojo and remove the
>>> one in geronimo
>>>
>>> Emmanuel
>>>
>>> Jason Dillon a écrit :
>>>> Did you tell 'evenisse' to go ahead with moving the plugin to
>>>> the codehaus?
>>>> I don't really mind if it moves over there... but looks like
>>>> that its been done already... and its not really moved, but its
>>>> cloned, which is a massive PITA.
>>>> We really don't need to have 2 plugins...
>>>> --jason
>>>
>
