Say what?
Will -v, -vv and -vvv stop working? If yes, then I don't think we
should switch as what we have is currently working fine.
-dain
On Feb 27, 2007, at 12:20 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
I don't believe there is anything which prevents the syntax from
being the same... except, that the '-vv' and '-v' options end up
merging into one '-v' option, which can be specified more than one
to increase verbosity, so the usage of '-vv' is the same, but
technically there would be no '-vv' option, just a '-v'.
--jason
On Feb 27, 2007, at 9:48 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I don't care as long as you don't change the cli syntax. IIRC the
code originally used commons cli, but someone removed it because
it wasn't flexible enough. It was a very long time ago, so my
memory is fuzzy.
-dain
On Feb 26, 2007, at 6:02 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Anyone mind if I re-write org.apache.geronimo.system.main.Daemon
to use commons-cli to handle option processing?
Use of commons-cli 1.0 add ~30k to the bootstrap classpath (uses
commons-lang, which is already there), and will greatly simplify
this code, and make it a little easier/nicer to add more command-
line options in the future as well as providing.
--jason
