Lin, The problem here is that there is no webservices.xml and is solely dependent upon the WebService annotation.
The question is...is Axis2 processing the WebService annotation? Upon stepping through the code, I did not see that getting called anywhere. One possible solution is that Geronimo processes the annotation and passes the proper PortInfo object to Axis2. I didn't want to do that if Axis2 was also processing the annotation. Jeff Lin Sun wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > Thanks for noticing this issue. I just ran a bit test myself with a > faily recent server built last Friday, and I got different result than > you. Here are mine: > > 1) when targetNamespace are specified in both wsdl and annotation and in > webservices.xml file, the wsdl-file is used like: > > <wsdl-file>WEB-INF/wsdl/greeter_control.wsdl</wsdl-file> > > I would get > > targetNamespace="http://apache.org/greeter_control"; > > from a ?wsdl request. > > This code should be fairly straight-forward, as we would just generate > the WSDLDefition using AxisServiceGenerator().getWSDLDefition and write > it out to the response. > > So in summary, this is working correctly. Seems your scenario is this > case, so I would suggest making sure you have a reference to your > wsdl-file in your webservices.xml file. > > 2) When wsdl is not used, for example, I specify > "<wsdl-file></wsdl-file>" in my webservices.xml file, then I would > notice the prob you described. In this case, we rely on Axis2 and call > AxisService.printWSDL. > > HTH, Lin > > > > > > Jeff Genender wrote: >> Ok... >> >> I am pretty certain at this stage that the WebService annotation is not >> getting processed. Can you point me to the code that handles this in >> Axis2? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jeff >> >> >> >> Jeff Genender wrote: >>> Thanks...this is very helpful. >>> >>> Then by this, looking at the PortInfo, it appears as though it is not >>> stuffing in the WSDL file, which tells me it's a G thang ;-) >>> >>> Jeff >>> >>> Lasantha Ranaweera wrote: >>>> Hi Jeff, >>>> >>>> To my understanding if we have given a WSDL in an archive it should get >>>> the priority than the information in the annotations. >>>> >>>> In Axis2 integration there are two parts of implementation with one for >>>> with WSDL which is mainly handling by G side while with annotations >>>> from >>>> Axis2. For me it is something missing in G side. >>>> >>>> Somebody in the list please correct me if I am wrong here . >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Lasantha >>>> Jeff Genender wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I have noticed when I deploy a war file (with a WSDL), I have a >>>>> certain >>>>> target name specified both in the WSDL and in the code that uses a >>>>> WebService annotation. >>>>> >>>>> However, when I go retrieve the WSDL, I notice the target name >>>>> seems to >>>>> be munged according to the package name (backwards) of the code that >>>>> contains the WebService annotation. >>>>> >>>>> Example... >>>>> >>>>> I have include a WSDL called Hello.wsdl that is in the war file in the >>>>> web-inf/wsdl directory and starts with: >>>>> >>>>> <wsdl:definitions targetNamespace="http://example.com/hello/xsd";> >>>>> ... >>>>> >>>>> I have a HelloWorld.java that has this: >>>>> >>>>> package test.mypackage; >>>>> >>>>> import javax.jws.WebMethod; >>>>> import javax.jws.WebService; >>>>> >>>>> @WebService(name="HelloWorld", targetNamespace = >>>>> "http://example.org/hello/xsd";) >>>>> public class HelloWorld { >>>>> >>>>> @WebMethod >>>>> public String sayHello(String me){ >>>>> return "Hello "+me; >>>>> } >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> However, when I request the wsdl...I get something like this: >>>>> >>>>> <wsdl:definitions targetNamespace="http://mypackage.test/xsd";> >>>>> ... >>>>> >>>>> Notice the targetnamespace was munged and changed from it's originally >>>>> declared namespace of "http://example.com/hello/xsd";. I want the one >>>>> that is both declared in the included wsdl (or the one declared in the >>>>> annotation). >>>>> >>>>> Is this a facet of Axis2 or is Geronimo not passing a proper PortInfo >>>>> object with the necessary stuff filled in? >>>>> >>>>> Any light on this subject would be greatly appreciated ;-) >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Jeff >>>>> >>>>> >>
