I played with it a little, though I have not tried to include these
deps into the assembly or TCK it... its really not that easy to test
that, given that it requires installing a new repo configuration in
mvn. Once we have our own svn-backed repo this will be *much*
easier, but I won't have time to make that a reality for a few months
I'd imagine.
--jason
On Mar 9, 2007, at 2:22 AM, James Strachan wrote:
FWIW the first RC of ActiveMQ 4.1.1 is available if you wanna try
it out...
Maven 1 and 2 repos are located here:
http://people.apache.org/~chirino/activemq-4.1.1-RC1/
The release distributions are here:
http://people.apache.org/~chirino/activemq-4.1.1-RC1/maven2/org/
apache/activemq/apache-activemq/4.1.1/
So I hope 4.1.1 will be out pretty soon (say by end of next week at
the latest)
On 3/9/07, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think the yoko release is on the way if not out.
Jiras && my opinion:
GERONIMO-433 Tolerate non-Sun JREs
has anyone tried this? with yoko it ought to work
Patch Available GERONIMO-2289
GeronimoAsMavenServlet.java
generates wrong default-repository element
No idea
GERONIMO-2697 OpenEJB schemas missing in Geronimo 1.2 distribution
we should fix this. Should be a 1 line change in some pom.
GERONIMO-2672 Improving the Deployment schema documentation -
geronimo-application.xsd
no idea
GERONIMO-2818 In-Place deployment does not interpret Manifest
Class-Path entries correctly in JAR files
I'd guess this is easy if someone can figure out what's going wrong,
would be good to fix
GERONIMO-2918 Have the ActiveMQ broker configured from an external
configuration file by default
I'm not sure this is such a great idea, but I'm not sure. Actually I
wonder about making an amq config builder that can read these files
natively (and also gbeans etc). This is probably too much for 1.2.
GERONIMO-2927 Cannot rebuild Geronimo with external ActiveMQ XBean
configuration because Spring Framework is missing
This seems pretty important. I think this involves adding spring to
the amq-broker config and hiding it in the amq config, a couple
minutes + testing.
thanks
david jencks
On Mar 8, 2007, at 9:43 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
> I think we should start wrapping up the SNAPSHOT deps we have in
> 1.2 to prepare for a release. These are the ones I am aware of:
>
> openejb 2.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT
> yoko 1.0-incubating-M2-SNAPSHOT
> activemq 4.1-SNAPSHOT
>
> ActiveMQ is on its way to releasing 4.1.1, which should be
> available soonish (maybe sometime next week?).
>
> When can we get non-SNAPSHOT artifacts from OpenEJB and Yoko?
>
> * * *
>
> There are also a few SNAPSHOT artifacts configured in the
> testsuite/*:
>
> maven-invoker-plugin 1.0-SNAPSHOT
> maven-surefire-plugin 2.8-SNAPSHOT
>
> We don't even use the maven-invoker-plugin, so that can be
> dropped. And the maven-surefire-plugin is for TestNG support, and
> there isn't much hope of getting that resolved any time soon. But,
> these don't need to be non-SNAPSHOT's for the release (would be
> nice though) since this module is not included in the default
build.
>
> I suppose we could include the maven-surefire-plugin 2.8-SNAPSHOT
> (and its deps) in the repository module (using timestamp-build
> versions). But IMO its not a requirement or blocking issue for 1.2
> releasability.
>
> * * *
>
> There are also 8 unresolved JIRA's for 1.2:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?
> reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/
> field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=10220&fixfor=12310181
>
> Anyone know of any other issues which need to be wrapped up for
> 1.2? And/or if any of the above issues should be resolved/deferred
> for another release? If you have a moment, please take a peek.
>
> --jason
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
