Jimmy cracked corn then.
On Mar 19, 2007, at 4:42 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Actually, if old20 is not going to live long... then I don't care ;-)
--jason
On Mar 19, 2007, at 1:35 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Why old20? Why not just make ejb3 some new version, like 3.0 or
something, and then make the current trunk branches/2.0 ?
--jason
On Mar 19, 2007, at 1:21 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I talked with David J and Chris B about taking DT trunk and
moving it to branches/old20 and promoting branches/ejb3 to
trunk. Any objections?