[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim McConnell updated GERONIMO-3006:
------------------------------------
Attachment: GERONIMO-3006.patch
Added code to definitively distinquish between the two usages of @WebServiceRef
annotation such that the proper DD tags are generated:
1) To declare a generated service class, and
2) To specify an SEI
> WebServiceRef injection ignored .value attribute
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-3006
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3006
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: webservices
> Reporter: Jarek Gawor
> Assigned To: Tim McConnell
> Attachments: GERONIMO-3006.patch
>
>
> WebServiceRef annotation can be defined as the following:
> @WebServiceRef(name="accounting",
> value=AccountingService.class)
> AccountingPortType foo;
> or
> @WebServiceRef(name="accounting"
> AccountingService.class)
> AccountingPortType foo;
> Currently, the above annotations will result in the following error message:
> AccountingPortType does not extend javax.xml.rpc.Service or
> javax.xml.ws.Service
> at
> org.apache.geronimo.naming.deployment.SwitchingServiceRefBuilder.buildNaming(SwitchingServiceRefBuilder.java:130)
> Which looks like the WebServiceRef.value is ignored and the service-ref is
> created incorrectly (service-interface should be set to AccountingService
> class and service-ref-type should be set to AccountingPortType class)
> Section 4.2.2 in JSR 109 to see how exactly the WebServiceRef annotation
> attributes are translated into the DD. Also, section 7.9 in JAXWS 2.0 might
> be helpful.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
