[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12483877
 ] 

Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-433:
---------------------------------------

Um... is this a problem with G, AMQ, TranQL or Derby?

What in 2.0 requires the Sun JDK?  I know that the Apple JDK works fine, but 
its much more closely related to the Sun JDK than IBM's JDK is.  Maybe IBM 
should try to be more compatible :-P

But really... why can't IBM's JDK build 2.0?

> Tolerate non-Sun JREs
> ---------------------
>
>                 Key: GERONIMO-433
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-433
>             Project: Geronimo
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: general
>    Affects Versions: 1.0-M4
>            Reporter: Glyn Normington
>         Assigned To: Rick McGuire
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 1.2
>
>
> Geronimo fails to build against a non-Sun JRE (e.g. IBM's) because of the use 
> of non-standard Sun internal classes (in com.sun.* packages) such as 
> com.sun.security.jgss.GSSUtil. The build stops with:
> A compilation error occurred in the network module:
> C:\apache\geronimo\modules\network\src\java\org\apache\geronimo\network\protocol\GSSAPIServerProtocol.java:29:
> package com.sun.security.jgss does not exist import 
> com.sun.security.jgss.GSSUtil;
> grep also found the following other references to com.sun in Java files, some 
> of which will need to be modified to tolerate non-Sun JREs.
> modules/client/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/client/StaticJndiContextPlugin.java:
>         System.setProperty("java.naming.factory.initial", 
> "com.sun.jndi.rmi.registry.RegistryContextFactory");
> modules/connector/src/test/org/apache/geronimo/connector/outbound/ManagedConnectionFactoryWrapperTest.java:
>         env.put("java.naming.factory.initial", 
> "com.sun.jndi.rmi.registry.RegistryContextFactory");
> modules/naming/src/test/org/apache/geronimo/naming/geronimo/GeronimoRootContextTest.java:
>         System.setProperty("java.naming.factory.initial", 
> "com.sun.jndi.rmi.registry.RegistryContextFactory");
> modules/naming/src/test/org/apache/geronimo/naming/java/AbstractContextTest.java:
>         System.setProperty("java.naming.factory.initial", 
> "com.sun.jndi.rmi.registry.RegistryContextFactory");
> modules/naming/src/test/org/apache/geronimo/naming/java/ThreadContextTest.java:
>         System.setProperty("java.naming.factory.initial", 
> "com.sun.jndi.rmi.registry.RegistryContextFactory");
> modules/security/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/security/realm/providers/KerberosSecurityRealm.java:
>         AppConfigurationEntry entry = new 
> AppConfigurationEntry("com.sun.security.auth.module.Krb5LoginModule",
> modules/security/src/test/org/apache/geronimo/security/jaas/LoginKerberosNonGeronimoTest.java:
>         gbean.setAttribute("loginModuleName", 
> "com.sun.security.auth.module.Krb5LoginModule");
> modules/security/src/test/org/apache/geronimo/security/network/protocol/SubjectCarryingProtocolTest.java:import
>  com.sun.security.auth.login.ConfigFile;
> modules/system/src/test/org/apache/geronimo/system/properties/NamingPropertiesTest.java:
>     private static final String NAMING_FACTORY_INITIAL = 
> "com.sun.jndi.rmi.registry.RegistryContextFactory";

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to