On 3/24/07, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The milestone naming is fine. But whatever we do, let's do it
consistently in the future too. We are establishing a precedent here.

1) stay with milestones even when we are feature complete.
2) have milestones before we are feature complete and switch to beta
when we are feature complete.

I'd say the 2nd option is what I like the most.

Jacek

--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl

Reply via email to