[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12483956
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-2778:
----------------------------------------
Isn't this implemented by now?
> Deployer should always fill in required <local> or <remote> interfaces
> elements in <ejb-ref>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-2778
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2778
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: deployment
> Affects Versions: 2.0-M2, 2.0
> Reporter: Prasad Kashyap
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.0-beta1, 2.0
>
>
> For a proper ejb-ref to an EJB 3.0 bean (i.e. a business interface) it *must*
> have the <remote> or <local> and must *not* have the <home> or <local-home>.
> These can only be omitted in the case of dependency injection where the code
> using the @EJB to generate a metadata-complete ejb-ref should *always* fill
> in the <remote> element of the <ejb-ref> element. If the user does not
> specify the 'beanInterface' attribute of the @EJB annotation, then the code
> building the reference must use the class type of the field or method as the
> value of '<remote>'.
> There is an edge case where you truly do not know if the @EJB is pointing to
> a local object or a remote object and therefore don't know whether to build a
> ejb-ref or an ejb-local-ref. For OpenEJB we build an ejb-ref and flag it as
> being "ambiguous", then in the jndi building code we try to resolve it
> against the full list of available ejbs. We'll have to figure out some way
> to communicate this edge case to the ejb naming builder so we can deal with
> it.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
