They don't build. There's a problem with missing CXF classes.
Regards,
Alan
On Apr 1, 2007, at 12:39 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
See the reply to Alan on the sources.
Regarding the assemblies no, I won't be publishing them per the
earlier discussion.
On Apr 1, 2007, at 3:33 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Matt are you still deploying assemblies?
This looks like the work of the release plugin trying to make
source archives out of the module... this isn't really a -src
assembly which contains the entire src of the project.
--jason
On Apr 1, 2007, at 12:12 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
The sources seem to be missing. Is there any reason why they're
in jars and not zip/tgz?
Regards,
Alan
On Apr 1, 2007, at 2:54 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I have placed the 2.0-M4 binaries out on http://
people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M4-rc1 for you to take a look
at. (They are uploading as I write this).
I have done some testing with DayTrader. There is an issue in
connecting with he MDB container which still needs to be worked
out so the application will not deploy as is. However, given
the scopwe of function DayTrader covers as well as all the late
code drops I don't see an issue with that. Smaller samples
should be ok and tests look good. Given that we're in the final
stages of testing I'd like to get this Milestone on the wire as
is and fix issues in trunk. Users that pull this binary and
report issues will help us in the Drive to 5.
Other than that limitation I think this Milestone looks ready to
go.
After reviewing the content please cast your vote.
[ ] +1 - Release these binaries
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Do not release these binaries (provide reason)
This vote will conclude on April 4th at 0600 Eastern.
Thanks!
