I tend to agree since these are milestone snapshots not real
releases, but am wondering how the repo/source release part would
work. Can someone explain?
Regards,
Alan
On Apr 3, 2007, at 6:29 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
Agree, lets release M4 as-is with the repo and source zipfiles, in
case anyone wants to debug a problem they find....
-Donald
Hernan Cunico wrote:
can't we just provide the binaries?, it is a milestone release
that will live less than a month.
Cheers!
Hernan
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
On Apr 3, 2007, at 4:57 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
I'll upload the 11 Axis2 and 11 CXF artifacts into the M4
branches local repo and update the pom.xml if someone will
either respin/republish the build for me or walk me through how
to do it....:-)
Donald, excellent and I appreciate it.
I would checkout the 2.0-M4 in branches to start with. There
must be some lingering issue in hte build or we somehow picked up
the SNAPSHOT though some transitive dependencies.
If you like I can provide you with the repo I used for this
build. It may be possible to address Alan's concern about being
able to rebuild as well.
Although, personally I think the time invested in 2.0 is better
spent than waving a dead chicken on 2.0-M4. By the time it get
built and voted on we'll be into next week most likely with the
next milestone a few weeks away.
I think a better solution would be to simply create an unstable
set and put them up on people.apache.org.
Other's thoughts?
-Donald
