Using a < 1.5 JVM is more likely to barf up a class version
incompatibility... unless the bootstrap modules (and their libraries)
are compiled to be compatible with 1.4, but I don't think that is
worth trying to enforce.
I don't see any point in adding this extra warning layer muck.
--jason
On Apr 10, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
I would think we'd need to check for Java < 1.5 more urgently than
Java > 1.5.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 4/10/07, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wanted to see what everyone's opinion was before I integrate the
patch
for G2759 -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2759
which re-enables the JVMCheck code that we had in 1.1 to warn
users if
they try to run the server on a non-Java SE 5 JVM (like Java SE 6.)
-Donald
