Surya... I really like the idea of adding security to DayTrader to assess
the performance impact of J2EE and Java 2 security. What changes would be
necessary to add this in? Would it involve changes to the code in any way,
or would it simply involve changes to properties and/or DD files? Also, how
easy would it be to switch in between the secured and un-secured versions?
As a side note, I think this JIRA should be opened against DAYTRADER, not
GERONIMO.
Chris
On 4/16/07, Surya V Duggirala (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Role Based J2EE security model for DayTrader Benchmark
------------------------------------------------------
Key: GERONIMO-3101
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3101
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: New Feature
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Reporter: Surya V Duggirala
To characterize and assess the performance of Security runtime for J2EE
role based security and Java 2 Security, we need a secured version of
DayTrader. This can be useful for Web Authenticatin and Authorization and
EJB Authentication and Authorization etc.,
Currently I am working on assessing the security performance using
DayTrader and wondering whether anyone has done similar studies with
DayTrader.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
--
"I say never be complete, I say stop being perfect, I say let... lets
evolve, let the chips fall where they may." - Tyler Durden
