I concur...if there are no objections by the end of the week I'll
delete it.
On May 3, 2007, at 2:41 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
m4 never got cooked fully, which is why the branch is still there.
it was decided to just move on to m5 due to problems with the m4
branch. The branch should probably be removed.
--jason
On May 3, 2007, at 2:35 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
This may not be a big or important (??) thing... G 2.0-M4 is still
under branches.
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.0-M4/ .
We should tag the release as we have done for other milestone
releases.
Vamsi
