As noted elsewhere I found some documentation on the expected release
procedure and it isn't quite what I remembered.
I'm fine with releasing either ws-metadata 1.1.1 spec jar, although
unless someone can convince me that the scm info in the rc2 one will
be correct I'd prefer to release the first one that is missing scm info.
+1 to one or the other 1.1.1 ws-metadata jar.
thanks
david jencks
On Jun 14, 2007, at 11:22 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I don't understand the release process for specs to tell what is
going on, however there is no https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/
geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.1 (what i'd
expect a 1.1.1 to be under) nor a https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/
geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1 (what is
actually shown in the newly added scm info). IMO its slightly
better to have no information rather than wrong information.
At this point I'm
+0 on releasing the original (no scm info) ws-metadata 1.1.1 jar
-0 on releasing the modified one.
Keeping track of the spec release procedure is beyond my limited
abilities, but what is happening is not what I expected. My dim
recollections of the release procedure was that we would use the
maven release plugin and that would correctly tag the source and
generate/modify all the artifacts consistent with the new tag. I'm
confused because there is no 1.1.1 tag that I can find for ws
metadata and the scm info does not appear to be getting updated.
Is this a maven bug, is it not supposed to be updated by the
release plugin, or something else?
thanks
david jencks
On Jun 14, 2007, at 8:21 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
CXF is looking to cut their release starting on Friday and they
need the WS-MetaData spec. Originally this was approved except it
was missing the SCM tag. Prasad added that but this puts this
particular spec being released after their date. It would be
really helpful if we could approve this spec by tomorrow
(Friday). Anyone opposed or have a comment on how to handle this?
On Jun 13, 2007, at 5:13 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Please review the specifications located at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc2
The only changes that were made to the binaries that passed a vote
over the past weekend was to add the scm section to the pom.xml.
I have dropped jsp specs from the vote now.
ws-metadata will have a 3 digit version number (1.1.1) because 1.1.0
was already released some 6 weeks ago. This is a minor update to the
released version.
Voting concludes on Saturday, June 16th at 1700 ET.
Cheers
Prasad
