Um... sure... but now right now... too many beers.
:-P
But JCL or SLF4J, we still need some serious logging reform...
--jason
On Jun 15, 2007, at 6:36 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 6/15/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And, I think we should seriously consider using SLF4J ( http://
www.slf4j.org/ ) and drop JCL.
I've never used SLF4J before, but it's again I could hear about it
from you (I'm pretty sure it was you who tried to persuade us to use
it). Could you tell a bit more why slf4j is better than jcl. Why is it
worth to move to slf4j - I guess it'd mean a lot of changes in the
code, wouldn't it?
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
