Correction.

The released j2ee-1.4 schema jars are here
http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/schema/geronimo-schema-j2ee_1.4/1.1/

The earlier link I posted are for our *deployed* 1.1-SNAPS of jee5
schema... not *released*.
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/geronimo/schema/geronimo-schema-jee_5/1.1-SNAPSHOT/

Neverthless, they all have *.xsb files in them.

Cheers
Prasad

On 7/19/07, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The 1.1-SNAPSHOT that we released earlier has the XSBs in them too.

http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/geronimo/schema/geronimo-schema-jee_5/1.1-SNAPSHOT/

so i guess this is ok too ?

cheers
prasad

On 7/18/07, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I used -
>     grep -t "Sun" *
> on WinXP to find the copyright and then opened the file with Visual SlickEdit
> , which will open anything and handles embedded nulls.....
>
> On Linux, open the file with vi and just search for Sun.
>
>
> -Donald
>
> Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> > What did you use to view the xsb ? I tried viewing a few (not
> > index.xsb) and saw binary data. So I thought it was ok.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Prasad
> >
> > On 7/18/07, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Well, the following compiled file inside geronimo-schema-jee_5-1.1.jar
> >> still
> >> has the Sun copyright header in it -
> >>
> >> 
schemaorg_apache_xmlbeans\system\s89707DCAF3CBDF7238EB45FA6C3735CD\index.xsb
> >>
> >>
> >> Is that OK?
> >>
> >>
> >> -Donald
> >>
> >> Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> >> > Please review the release candidate of version 1.1 of
> >> > geronimo-schema-jee_5.
> >> >
> >> > The tar ball is at
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~prasad/geronimo-schema-jee_5-1.1.tar.gz
> >> >
> >> > The svn location (with restricted access) is at
> >> >
> >> 
https://svn.apache.org/repos/tck/geronimo-tck/schema/geronimo-schema-jee_5/branches/1.1/
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > The vote will conclude at 2:00 pm EST on Sat, July 21st.
> >> >
> >> > Thanx
> >> > Prasad
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to