On 7/30/07, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jul 28, 2007, at 1:41 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: > > > > On 7/28/07, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Jul 26, 2007, at 1:21 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: > > > > How about adding a "Tech Preview" portlet group in Admin Console in G > > 2.0 where we can include the portlets (for e.g., the "Create Plan" > > portlet Shiva is working on. See > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3254 > > ) for which user feedback will play a great role in improving those > > further. Once we decide on whether to retain those or not, we can either > > move them out to a different group or remove them from Admin Console > > accordingly. > > > > > > Some of the new pluggable console support would have helped, here. But > > that's not going into 2.0. Personally, sounds like this should go into > > trunk, if it's not ready... Can still get good feedback... > > > > --kevan > > > > > The idea is that if these portlets go in as part of a release with > binaries readily available for download, we have a better chance of getting > more users to try the portlets and possibly provide some feedback too in the > linked wiki pages. If it goes only into trunk, the users will still have to > build the binaries from trunk, which they may not want to/may not succeed > due to some reason or the other. > > > Yes, I understood the idea. > > If a committer thinks that this code is ready and wants to commit it, then > why isn't it in trunk? If it was in trunk, then we could evaluate and > discuss getting it into branches/2.0. I'm currently doubtful that it should > go into 2.0... >
I forgot to ask in my last reply... Matt, does any new stuff going into branches\2.0 come in the way of release schedules or sorts at this point? Vamsi --kevan > > > >
