I had never noticed http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/ and http://archive.apache.org/dist/geronimo/ !
The download links from "Available releases" section of http://geronimo.apache.org/downloads.html were directly taking me to some mirror site. It was only today that I noticed that http://geronimo.apache.org/downloads.html does have a link (with name main distribution directory) to that page but under "Verifying the integrity of the files" section. Does http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/ deserve a better mention, may be directly under "Available releases" section? Equal surprises by looking at http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/ & http://archive.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/ for the first time! I will be happy to see some highlighted links from http://geronimo.apache.org/development-tools.html to those pages. Thanks, Shiva On 8/22/07, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > right, actually the Archive section on the web site should be just a link > this server. I don't think we mention anywhere else about this server. > > As for removing those pages, for now I would suggest to change the parent > page to "no show" instead of removing them permanently. > > Cheers! > Hernan > > Matt Hogstrom wrote: > > The distributions are all automatically archived at > > http://archive.apache.org/dist/geronimo/ > > > > > > On Aug 21, 2007, at 1:58 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote: > > > >> how about an archive section instead of permanently removing? > >> We would have 2.0.1 and 1.1.1 as the latest stable and official > >> releases, we should add the release date too. Then an Archive section > >> for 1.0, 1.1 and 1.2. Thoughts? > >> Cheers! > >> Hernan > >> > >> Matt Hogstrom wrote: > >>> All, > >>> Since 1.1.1 is the stable version of Geronimo I'd like to propose > >>> that we remove the older versions from the download site. If there > >>> are no objections I'll do this tomorrow when we announce the 2.0.1 > >>> release. > >> > > > > >
