Kevan Miller wrote: > So, to be clear -- I certainly didn't mean to imply that *only* you > could certify these alternate configurations of Geronimo. If anyone with > TCK access wants to run these tests, then that's fantastic. I don't plan > on running them. If I see requests from Geronimo users requesting > certification of these configurations, then I'd probably run them myself.
Well...nobody asked you to run them. But, your statement is somewhat offensive...I guess I don't really get the distinction between requests from "users" and requests from your co-committers...what are the rest of us, chopped liver? Aren't we all users? You certainly are setting the stage for making me want to help you out when you throw out an idea on the lists or have an issue that needs looking into (http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg39121.html). I'll be sure to use that ideology the next time you need a favor...great community spirit! ;-) At any rate, lets let this go...its going down a slippery slope...this already has gone off topic and contains overtones of personal issues that are not even related to the discussion (i.e. someone's having a bad day). Jeff
