Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.0.0 (RC2)

[Donald Woods]

Or use the WTP 2.0.1 All-in-one bundle when its released, as it should include the Eclipse SDK "Classic" bundle as the WTP 2.0 all-in-one bundle included.

-Donald

Donald Woods wrote:

Thanks for the clarification. Guess if users only wanted Geronimo 2.0 server support, then they could use the intended "for Java EE Developers" package, as that has been working for me, but I've only been testing against a 2.0.1 server....

-Donald

Shiva Kumar H R wrote:

On 9/13/07, *Donald Woods* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

    Need to be more specific on the Eclipse package that users need, now
    that
    there are 5 different distros -


    1 -- Eclipse IDE for Java EE Developers (Europa v3.3 or later)

> 1 -- Europa (also known as Eclipse 3.3), which is platform specific Oh! there seems to be a confusion here. Please see http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/moreinfo/compare.php

- Shiva

    Also, by prereqing WTP 2.0.1, I think it requires newer levels of
    the all the
    packages, based on the current prereq levels listed for WTP 2.0.1
    RC1 at the
    top of the following download page -

1) So "Eclipse IDE for Java EE Developers" (125MB) is actually Eclipse Platform + WTP & it's pre-reqs. Ideally this should have been 'the only' pre-requisite for Geronimo Eclipse Plug-in (GEP). However we are currently running into a problem using this (Geronimo v1.0 & v1.2 servers are not appearing in the list of available servers). Hence we have deferred using this until next GEP release i.e. 2.1. Please see GERONIMODEVTOOLS-180. I guess not having another JIRA opened for this problem, is the source of confusion. I will open a JIRA soon after this. 2) "Eclipse Classic" (140MB) is the one to be listed as the correct pre-requisite here for GEP 2.0. http://download.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/R2.0/M-2.0.1RC1-20070907070540/

    Which means its targeted to Eclipse 3.3.1 which is supposed to ship
    by end of
    Sept.


    -Donald

    Ted Kirby wrote:
     > Looks good.  Thanks Tim.
     > Attached are some minor updates/feedback on your instructions.
     >
     > On 9/12/07, Tim McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
     >> Start of discussion thread.....
     >> --
     >> Thanks,
     >> Tim McConnell
     >>

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature