Shiva Kumar H R wrote:
Great. Thanks Tim.

Some minor corrections required to the website:
1) "Prerequisites" section currently says,
   1. Sun JDK 5.0+ (J2SE 1.5)
   2. Europa (also known as Eclipse 3.3), which is platform specific
   3. Web Tools Platform (WTP) 2.0.1
   4. Data Tools Platform (DTP) 1.5
   5. Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) 2.3
   6. Graphical Editing Framework (GEF) 3.3
Should be:
   1. Sun JDK 5.0+ (J2SE 1.5)
2. Eclipse 3.3.1 (Eclipse Classic package of Europa distribution), which is platform specific
   3. Web Tools Platform (WTP) 2.0.1
   4. Data Tools Platform (DTP) 1.5.1
   5. Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) 2.3.1
   6. Graphical Editing Framework (GEF) 3.3.1
This was discussed earlier also. Please see http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg51362.html


Done

2) In "Downloads: Latest Release - Version 2.0.0" section:
release notes <http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/PLUGIN_RELEASE-NOTES-2.0.0.txt> link points to a non-existing document.


Done, but I hope you can review the release notes as well, since you had requested specific content.

3) In "Installation Alternatives" section:
"The plug-in can be installed directly from within the plugin by clicking on the "Don't see your server listed?" ..." "... from within the plugin" is confusing. Was it meant to be "from within the WTP" ?


Done

4) In "Installation Alternatives" section:
"Download the plugin from http://apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/2.0.0/ and unzip it into the same directory ..." In http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg50304.html Matt had expressed concerns about direct mentioning of http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/ site address. I think we need to come up with something like "the download link in http://geronimo.apache.org/apache-geronimo-v201-release.html "


Not completely yet--will work with Hernan on this....

5) In "News" section:
"Presentation titled "J2EE Application Development on Apache Geronimo Simplified using Eclipse". Click here^ <http://geronimo.apache.org/GMOxDOC11/j2ee-application-development-on-apache-geronimo-simplified-using-eclipse.html> to view: " The link is currently pointing to a non-existent doc in geronimo.apache.org <http://geronimo.apache.org> space. Referred doc is in cwiki.apache.org <http://cwiki.apache.org> space. So the correct link would be "http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC11/j2ee-application-development-on-apache-geronimo-simplified-using-eclipse.html <http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC11/j2ee-application-development-on-apache-geronimo-simplified-using-eclipse.html>"

Done


6) In "News" section:
Links for "Java Developers Day 2007 in Krakow" and "EclipseWorld 2007" aren't yet pointing to their specific docs, but rather just point to http://cwiki.apache.org/geronimo/. I guess these will be updated once their corresponding wiki pages are created.

Yes, I'm hoping that Jacek will allow us to use his presentation from Java Developers Day 2007, and I'm going to provide links to my EclipseWorld 2007 presentations when they are completed.


7) In "JBoss to Geronimo Migration Tool (J2G)" section:
"... migrating the sources of an application written for the JBoss application server or written for Java 2 Enterprise Edition (J2EE) to the Apache Geronimo platform." Haven't yet explored J2G plug-in much. So curious to know what we mean by "or written for Java 2 Enterprise Edition (J2EE)"? Does J2G toolkit also help! in creating Geronimo specific deployment plans for generic J2EE modules?

I'm not sure--I got this verbiage from Jason, Viet, Eric. They are probably better qualified to answer.


8) I guess "Downloads" section of J2G is still not yet complete.


Not yet

Thanks,
Shiva

On 9/26/07, *Tim McConnell* < [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

    Hi Erik, Jason and Viet, Today I've updated the "Apache Geronimo
    Development
    Tools Subproject" website (below) to include the latest information
    about the
    new release of the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin.

    ---> http://geronimo.apache.org/development-tools.html

    I've also included some information about the J2G Migration tool
    from some of
    the notes in this thread. Since I don't know a lot about this new
    tool, I'm
    hoping you all might review what I have thus far to see if it's
    kinda what you
    all had envisioned. Also, every Sunday I push out the latest trunk
    build of the
    Geronimo Eclipse plugin to our unstable site (below). I've assumed
    it's okay to
    do the same for the J2G plugin as well and have listed it in the
    downloads
    sections.

    ---> http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/
    <http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/>

    Thanks


    Erik B. Craig wrote:
     > All,
     >
     > After the recent round of changes and improvements around j2g (usable
     > from within the Eclipse IDE UI, Annotations support, improved
     > logging/information output, support for EJB 3), as well as a bit of
     > interest out in the general open source community in moving
    applications
     > from Jboss to Geronimo (such as today's inquiry on
    theserverside.com <http://theserverside.com>
     > <http://theserverside.com>), I feel as though it would be of some
     > benefit to have j2g, at least the content in our confluence wiki (
     > http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/j2g-migration-tool.html) linked
     > somewhere on the actual geronimo homepage. I was thinking either
    as it's
     > own link under 'Subprojects', much as Development Tools, GBuild, or
     > XBean are situated, or as an addition inside the Development
    Tools page,
     > much as the current Eclipse Plug-in section rests within there.
     >
     > I am willing to commit to doing a bit of additional writing
    (beyond what
     > is on the wiki) if it were to be under it's own section, or a
    subsection
     > of development tools if necessary, but I think it would be good
    to get
     > it up and out there sooner rather than later, especially to coincide
     > with the recent release of 2.0.1 to perhaps show those out there
     > remotely interested in migrating, there are tools available to
    assist
     > and perhaps 'hold their hand' a bit.
     >
     >
     > Thoughts? Comments? Objections?
     >
     > Thanks
     > --
     > Erik B. Craig

    --
    Thanks,
    Tim McConnell



--
Thanks,
Tim McConnell

Reply via email to