gnodet wrote:
>
> We need to have better support for endpoint filtering, but once we
> have this, it should be quite easy to add your interceptors and easily
> control the exchanges you receive.
> And this would just use wrap the provided ExchangeListener with a
> wrapping implementation using the define filtering. Makes sense ?
>
Even regarding 3.2 funcitonality and listeners based approach it would be
possibly nice
to have listener method enhanced by additional parameter - sort of filter
like function.
I mean something that provides "accept" method. For now all that
functionality I have made by myself (filtering based on checking QName
against
startsWith("http://.../servicename";)).
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Interceptors-like-functionality-tf4515215s12049.html#a12937836
Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
