Done Erik--please let me know if you require or notice anything else....
Erik B. Craig wrote:
Sounds good to me =)
On 10/2/07, *Tim McConnell* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Hi Erik, thanks very for reviewing. Sorry I didn't know that J2G has
its own
unstable site. So, I'll change the wiki to point to the j2g/unstable
site
instead of the eclipse/unstable site and change my build script to
FTP the
latest trunk version to the j2g/unstable site every Sunday morning.
That all
work for you ??
Erik B. Craig wrote:
> Edit:
> I'm a blind fool, nevermind.
> =(
>
> On 10/2/07, *Erik B. Craig* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:
>
> Tim,
>
> Sorry for the delay on this, but I just caught an issue on
the site...
> Under the
> "Daily Drivers" for J2G
> Unofficial daily drivers are available for download here.
> The URL points to the eclipse plugins directory at
> http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/
> <http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/> rather
> than the j2g section at
> http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/ j2g/unstable/
> <http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/j2g/unstable/
<http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/j2g/unstable/>>.
>
> In addition to this, the version up there for j2g is horribly
dated,
> and not functional to the best of my knowledge. There is
currently
> one attached to the wiki that could be uploaded in place, if you
> have sufficient access to do so (I am unfamiliar)
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/62470/
> j2g-conversion-1.0.0-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
>
<http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/62470/j2g-conversion-1.0.0-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
<http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/62470/j2g-conversion-1.0.0-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip>>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On 9/25/07, *Tim McConnell* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:
>
> Hi Erik, Jason and Viet, Today I've updated the "Apache
Geronimo
> Development
> Tools Subproject" website (below) to include the latest
> information about the
> new release of the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin.
>
> ---> http://geronimo.apache.org/development-tools.html
<http://geronimo.apache.org/development-tools.html>
>
> I've also included some information about the J2G
Migration tool
> from some of
> the notes in this thread. Since I don't know a lot about this
> new tool, I'm
> hoping you all might review what I have thus far to see
if it's
> kinda what you
> all had envisioned. Also, every Sunday I push out the latest
> trunk build of the
> Geronimo Eclipse plugin to our unstable site (below). I've
> assumed it's okay to
> do the same for the J2G plugin as well and have listed it
in the
> downloads
> sections.
>
> ---> http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/
> < http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Erik B. Craig wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > After the recent round of changes and improvements
around j2g
> (usable
> > from within the Eclipse IDE UI, Annotations support,
improved
> > logging/information output, support for EJB 3), as
well as a
> bit of
> > interest out in the general open source community in
moving
> applications
> > from Jboss to Geronimo (such as today's inquiry on
> theserverside.com <http://theserverside.com>
<http://theserverside.com <http://theserverside.com>>
> > <http://theserverside.com>), I feel as though it would
be of some
> > benefit to have j2g, at least the content in our
confluence
> wiki (
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/j2g-migration-tool.html) linked
> > somewhere on the actual geronimo homepage. I was thinking
> either as it's
> > own link under 'Subprojects', much as Development Tools,
> GBuild, or
> > XBean are situated, or as an addition inside the
Development
> Tools page,
> > much as the current Eclipse Plug-in section rests
within there.
> >
> > I am willing to commit to doing a bit of additional
writing
> (beyond what
> > is on the wiki) if it were to be under it's own
section, or a
> subsection
> > of development tools if necessary, but I think it
would be
> good to get
> > it up and out there sooner rather than later,
especially to
> coincide
> > with the recent release of 2.0.1 to perhaps show those
out there
> > remotely interested in migrating, there are tools
available to
> assist
> > and perhaps 'hold their hand' a bit.
> >
> >
> > Thoughts? Comments? Objections?
> >
> > Thanks
> > --
> > Erik B. Craig
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Tim McConnell
>
>
>
>
> --
> Erik B. Craig
>
>
>
>
> --
> Erik B. Craig
--
Thanks,
Tim McConnell
--
Erik B. Craig
--
Thanks,
Tim McConnell
