Actually, I'm suggesting we pull the web services out of DayTrader all together and write another web services sample app. If DayTrader is truly meant to be a "performance benchmark", why would you leave something in there that is in clear violation of performance best practices. Doesn't exactly send the right message if you ask me.
On 10/2/07, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Oct 1, 2007, at 11:23 PM, Christopher Blythe wrote: > > > Matt... > > > > > > In summary, I guess I really just wanted to say that I feel the web > > services modes in DayTrader should be removed at least until we can > > come up with something better. If the only reason to keep these > > around is to provide a "sample" and not a performance benchmark, > > lets come up with some other sample that demonstrates web services. > > > > You make a good point about the WebServices. I'd suggest that we > document the current limitations of comparing these WebServices in > performance benchmarks. That should help to set everyone's > expectations about the relevant usefulness of the data. > > For WebServices it sounds like your suggesting that we deprecate web > services for performance work rather than for functional purposes > like was done for the MDB primitives. I'd be for adding the warning > in a readme. > > -- "I say never be complete, I say stop being perfect, I say let... lets evolve, let the chips fall where they may." - Tyler Durden
